Editorial: A New Era with STEM Education?
Keywords:K-12 STEM education, integrated STEM, computational thinking, scientific and engineering thinking
Over the last two decades, discussions, rhetoric, recommendations have proposed numerous suggestions for the integrated STEM approach. Different approaches are based on different “interpretations” of the nature of integration, epistemological approaches and the implementation of didactic models to include engineering design. New aspects like artificial intelligence and mixed reality included in this volume can serve as STEM practices in alignment with the 21st century skills.
Boon Ng, S. (2019). Exploring STEM competences for the 21st century. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368485
Bryan, L., & Guzey, S. S. (2020). K-12 STEM Education: An Overview of Perspectives and Considerations. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.12973/hjstem/00110
English, L. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1–8.
Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing Assessment of Student Learning in Interdisciplinary STEM Education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–14.
Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. (2017). The impact of design-based STEM integration curricula on student achievement in science, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 207-222.
Hoppe, H. U. & Werneburg, S. (2019). Computational Thinking—More Than a Variant of Scientific Inquiry! In S.-C. Kong & H. Abelson (Eds.), Computational Thinking Education (pp. 13-30). Singapore: Springer.
Kong, S., Abelson, H., & Lai, M. (2019).Introduction to Computational Thinking Education. In: Kong SC., Abelson H. (Eds.) Computational Thinking Education. Springer, Singapore
Lehrer, R. (2016). Perspectives on elementary STEM education. Keynote address at the forum: putting STEM education under the microscope. Melbourne: Deakin University. Retrieved from https://blogs.deakin.edu.au/steme/wpcontent/uploads/sites/39/2017/04/Lehrer-Deakin_STEM_2_reduced.pdf
Mayes, R. (2019). Quantitative Reasoning and Its Role in Interdisciplinarity. In B. Doig, J. Williams, D. Swanson, R. Borromeo Ferri, & P. Drake, (Eds.) Interdisciplinary Mathematics Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11066-6
Mobley, M. C. (2015). Development of the SETIS Instrument to Measure Teachers' Self-Efficacy to Teach Science in an Integrated STEM Framework. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Tennessee, USA. Retrieved from https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3354
National Research Council (2012a). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
National Research Council (2012b). Discipline-based education research: understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: for States, by States. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
OECD (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030 – OECD Learning Compass 2030 – A Series of Concept Notes. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf
Psycharis, S., Kalovrektis, K., & Xenakis, A. (2020). A Conceptual Framework for Computational Pedagogy in STEAM education: Determinants and perspectives. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 17-32. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.12973/hjstem/01120
Psycharis, S. (2016). The Impact of Computational Experiment and Formative Assessment in Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning Approach in STEM Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 316–326 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9595-z
Psycharis S. (2019) Computational Thinking, Engineering Epistemology and STEM Epistemology: A Primary Approach to Computational Pedagogy. In Auer M., Tsiatsos T. (Eds.) The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education. ICL 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 917. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11935-5_65
Sanders, M.E. (2015). Integrative STEM Education: A more robust explanation. ITEEA digital resources. Retrieved from https://www.iteea.org/49346.aspx?sortby=name&dir=asc
Sanders, M.E., Sherman, T. & Watson, P. (2012). Engineering concepts taught and related teaching methods employed by Technology Education teachers. Proceedings: P-12 Engineering and Design Education Research Summit, Washington DC
Sanders, M. & Wells, J.G. (2006). Integrative STEM education. Retrieved from http://www.soe.vt.edu/istemed/
Schleicher, A. (2019). The OECD Learning Compass 20 https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/30)
Swanson H., Anton G., Bain C., Horn M., & Wilensky, U. (2019). Introducing and Assessing Computational Thinking in the Secondary Science Classroom. In Kong SC., Abelson H. (Eds.) Computational Thinking Education. Springer, Singapore.
Tytler, R., Prain, V. & Hobbs, L. (2019). Rethinking Disciplinary Links in Interdisciplinary STEM Learning: a Temporal Model. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09872-2
Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Xenakis, A., Xenakis, C., Psycharis, S., & Kalovrektis, K. (2020). Calculation of the Hubble Universe Expansion Constant by Analyzing Observational Data: An Exploratory Teaching Proposal based on STEM Epistemology. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Porto, Portugal, 2020, pp. 170-177, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125209.
Yaşar, O., Veronesi, P., Maliekal, J. & Little, L. (2015) ―Computational Pedagogical Content Knowledge (CPACK). In D. Slykhuis, & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education Conference 2015, pp. 3514-3521.
Yasar, O., Veronesi, P., Maliekal, J., Little, L. J., Vattana, S. E. & Yeter, I. H. (2016). Computational Pedagogy: Fostering a New Method of Teaching. Paper presented at ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. June 2016. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/64/papers/16226/download
How to Cite
The copyright of articles published in the Hellenic Journal of STEM Education belong to the authors.
Published articles are subject to Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.